Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Inner Circle > Sardelac Sanitarium

Notices

View Poll Results: Does anyone agree???
Yes 18 31.58%
No 21 36.84%
Undecided 1 1.75%
What where you thinking??? 17 29.82%
Voters: 57. This poll is closed

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Dec 01, 2008, 01:43 PM // 13:43   #21
Desert Nomad
 
Sjeng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: in my GH
Guild: Limburgse Jagers [LJ]
Profession: W/
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default

Strange poll...

isn't "What where you thinking???" just another way of saying "No." to the suggested option for officers NOT being able to promote members to officers?

Anyway, this is how WE do it:
I've started the guild with a RL friend, just to get something started back when props came out. We started inviting nice people we met ingame as members. We were tiny and grew. During the years we had lots of great and some not so great members. The not so great ones leave eventually or get kicked. The great ones stayed or stopped playing at some point.
The people we were most happy with get elected for possible officership, which we VOTE FOR on our guild forum. At first we figured we needed about 1 officer for every 8~10 members in our guild. So we select some members who have proved to be great assets to the guild, basically nice cooperative helpfull people who enjoy being in our guild, and start a voting topic. Then we simply promote the people with the most votes to officer, depending on how many we need. After 3.5 years we've gotten a pretty steady guild with approx. 50 members (of which approx 30 are active at least 4~5 days a week) and 7 officers.
If an officer decides he won't be active in GW anymore, or a lot less than before, he/she lets me know, and might ask for a demotion. Then we announce that and do the officer-selection poll once more for a new officer. Same if an officer isn't active anymore without letting us know. We vote for it.

So in short nobody gets promoted or kicked before we all decide on it. Simple as that. It's purely based on trust and democracy. And it has worked for us since the start.
Sjeng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 01, 2008, 01:49 PM // 13:49   #22
Desert Nomad
 
Sjeng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: in my GH
Guild: Limburgse Jagers [LJ]
Profession: W/
Default

strange. sorry for the double post...

Last edited by Sjeng; Dec 01, 2008 at 01:52 PM // 13:52..
Sjeng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 01, 2008, 09:15 PM // 21:15   #23
Forge Runner
 
Reverend Dr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Guild: Super Fans Of Gaile [ban]
Profession: W/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweet Mystery View Post
I was away for the weekend
It works both ways. I've been in a guild where the leader demoted everyone, then left for a week. Take a wild guess what happened to the guild.

We've been GvGing, still have people to play, but the last officer is about to leave and the leader isn't on. If officers can't promote someone else, then too bad stop playing GW. Only play GW on your leader's schedule.

Seriously for every reason to deny officers that ability, there is just as good of a reason to give it to them. Same difference one way or the other, the path of least action is the correct path. A needless change simply because a few people make bad judgements in recruiting and refuse to accept responsibility, instead attempting to displace it to "oh the system shouldn't be set up that way, wahhhhh!"
Reverend Dr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 01, 2008, 10:37 PM // 22:37   #24
Furnace Stoker
 
MagmaRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Guild: Our Crabs Know True [LOVE]
Profession: R/
Default

1) Recruit properly.
2) Promote properly.
3) Play.
4) Profit.
5)...

Don't see any reason to change things. As Pamelf said, a guild leader gets to pick who becomes an officer before anyone is one. If they select people who have the same views towards how the guild should be run, there won't be any problems. If you promote someone who doesn't share your views on the running of the guild, your mistake.
MagmaRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CoolWolf Sardelac Sanitarium 15 Aug 12, 2008 12:04 AM // 00:04
Guild Versus Guild [GvG] is Recruiting. Yup, Thats The Guild Name! <3 zeecron Guild Recruitment 0 Apr 06, 2008 03:32 AM // 03:32
A Beginner's Guild to Guild vs. Guild Battles: V. 0.5 Mithie Community Works 3 Jul 31, 2007 09:35 PM // 21:35
Ashleigh McMahon Questions & Answers 14 Jan 22, 2006 11:03 PM // 23:03
WTS Guild Yes Guild With Guild Hall And Cape kuji Sell 5 Sep 05, 2005 05:42 PM // 17:42


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:56 PM // 12:56.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("